Friday, November 20, 2009

The Two Identities of a Fallen Woman

In The Home for Homeless Women, the residents are trained to adapt to the way of life of the proper Victorian woman, abandoning the unacceptable behavior they practiced while living on the streets, in order to live new lives without malice from society. To avoid constantly shifting from prostitution to prison, these women are taught to do household tasks which will ultimately prepare them for their new lives abroad: "The distinctive feature of the home established by Miss Coutts and Dickens, Urania Cottage in Shepard's Bush, was that it prepared the girls for emigration, and a new life. This solution to the twin problems of social stigma and the pulling power of known ways and old companions appealed strongly to Dickens" (Homes for Homeless Women, 124). Although these girls would learn proper etiquette and how to tend to a family, their education at the home would be useless in their own country because English society would never accept these fallen women regardless of how far they have come. In order to obtain fulfilling lives without the fear of social stigma, these women must immigrate to a foreign land, erasing their pasts. They must project images of proper, well-behaved women while disguising the identities that have shaped them into the women they are.

Similarly, Lady Dedlock, a woman with an illegitimate child from a man who is not her husband, chooses to continue sheilding her sin from the world even after she confesses to her daughter, Esther, that they are in fact mother and daughter: "I must travel my dark road alone, and it will lead me where it will. From day to day, sometimes from hour to hour, I do not see the way before my guilty feet. This is the earthly punishment I have brought upon myself. I bear it, and I hide it" (450). Instead of accepting that she, like every other human being, makes mistakes and taking responsibility for her actions, Lady Dedlock must conceal her misdeed and continue to punish herself with guilt. Likewise, the women in the home for homeless women do not demonstrate to society, after having changed their ways, that they have learned from their immoral actions. Rather, they immigrate to a foreign land and pretend to be someone else. Fallen women are forced to deny the fact they have ever fallen and consequently, they are inclined to live double lives--inwardly, as the women that have brought them where they are and outwardly, as the women society expects them to be. Through his establishment of the home for homeless women and Lady Dedlock, a fictionalized example of a fallen woman, Dickens does not encourage society to accept women who are or have been in such situations. Instead, fallen women are expected to adapt to the guidelines that have been set for females all along.

14 comments:

  1. From reading Dickens's appeal to homeless women it is evident as Sifat pointed out, that women must conform to society's norms. Instead of havng women just work through their problems they have to just push it to the side and figure out how to just be a good housewife for society to think they are normal.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with Sifat that women are force to deny the fact they are fallen women. Dickens wanted these women to change and leave the past behind because he did not want other women in the society to contaminate with their fallen ways. Dickens did not want Lady Dedlock to contaminate the other women in London. This is Dickens way of social reform

    ReplyDelete
  3. But in forcing them out, was Dickens not giving these fallen women another chance at a better/normal life? It was a fact that English society as it was then would not allow them to rejoin them, so why not send them off to someplace else as different people? It's still a second chance. Look at the Witness Protection Program. It's not all that different.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I also agree with Sifat because after reading Homes for Homeless Women and comparing the women to Lady Deadlock I knotice that she does relate to these women. Lady Deadlock tries to cover what has happened in her past by being with Sir Deadlock. Just as the ladies in the Cottage have tried to cover up the fact that they used to be prostitutes by going to the Cottage and moving out of England after they have so-called changed their lives.

    ReplyDelete
  5. There are a lot of similarities between Lady Dedlock and the fallen women described in Dickens's other works. Lady Dedlock had a child out of wedlock, and thinking that the child was dead, moved on with her life and got married. Also, when her past came back, even though she reveals to Esther their relationship, she makes it clear that they can't have any contact.
    Lady Dedlock is supposed to forget about her past, move on and live her life as a wife.
    I believe that Dickens may be pointing out the flaw in society where a woman's only option if she was a former prostitute is to marry someone abroad. Dickens with Urania Cottage gave women a chance they never would have gotten in London during his time

    ReplyDelete
  6. I commented on this, and now I see that my comment has somehow disappeared. Hmmm....a murder mystery of my own is unfolding. The mytery of the murdered blog. Dun Dun Dun!!!!Anyway, I feel a reenactment coming on.

    Well, I think that Dickens's emphasis on housewifery over "book-education" is very limiting and will not aid his call for social reform. Dickens states in Homes that "book-education" comes second to learning how to care for one's home. However, this limited view and this limited teaching method may not lead to the results Dickens wants. Yes, there will be less prostitution; but one must ask why not help these women by educating them and then using them to help improve society? These women should at least be given the option to be formally educated.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I think it is only natural that Dickens's shape-up-and-ship-out solution to the problem of fallen/homeless women sounds a little extreme to our 21st-century ears. It is reminiscent of some other old-fashioned "solutions" for problematic populations, such as relocating slaves to Africa, or transporting prisoners to penal colonies. But on some level, as Eddie points out, it is a sort of pragmatic idea. One of the things that relocating a person does is to guarantee that those bad influences (people, environment) can't play a role any longer. It is still an idea that has currency -- think about the many prison programs of juvenile homes that try and remove people from their environments.

    In one of my other classes, we've been reading about social entrepreneurs, people who are trying to "save the world" but do so in a pragmatic rather than idealistic or ideological way. Dickens strikes me as fitting very much in this mold albeit in a 19th-century way. Something doesn't have to be perfect to be better than the alternative.

    Still, the question remains, what is the effect of his ideas about fallen women on his representation of not-fallen women (Ada, Esther, Caddy, Charley, Mrs. Bagnet to name a few), those women who have yet to step through the police house doors. What things do you see in Dickens's representation of these less vulnerable women that might be revealed in his understanding of fallen women?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Sara and I were commenting simultaneously, but I think we were having a harmonic convergence. Her observation that the limited education -- something perhaps seen as a necessary tradeoff for the fallen women -- might be part of a larger limiting of options for women in general. What else do you see -- associations between women and beauty? women and emotion? women and justice?

    ReplyDelete
  9. I agree with Sara, i think that education is the key to helping these women in the long run. education helps in literally every situation. instead of training these women to be housewives in another country why not help them pull themselves together and better the communities they are in already. shipping these troubled women away is a convenient solution to the problem but who is to say that these same issues wont arise in their new location. in order to eradicate the problem completely there should be a better emphasize on education for women instead of the focus on creating the perfect home.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Dickens understood that continuing to live the way these women have lived thus far was not a viable option. He also realized that people can not start over in the same place they made their mistakes. The people there would always associate these women with the mistakes they made and not accept the women they were trying to be. The only option was for these women to “move on”, to more to America or Australia where they knew no one and no one would have known their pasts. Taking them away from their used surroundings was a way to prevent them from reverting to their old way of life and forcing them to begin a new just like the modern day WITSEC program that Edward pointed out.
    On the subject of work in the home before education- I think that considering education as the answer is more of a modern day solution. In Dickens’ day it wasn’t considered that. I think he was only taking the first step toward educating women toward work outside of the home. I think he realized that the society needed the change but was not ready for such a drastic one and decided to take it one day at a time thereby first educating women for the home, thereby appeasing the society and only later on educating them about other things, like reading, writing, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Dickens idea of shipping out these women is not totally irrational it kind of makes sense. people normally change schools, move, or switch some aspect of their life in order for something they want to change to Change to switch in some. For lady deadlock it is running away from every aspect of life. From her bastard child she did not know existed,her lover and probably everything that ever made her feel in any form of discomfort. It is an easy way to cop-out of a problem that she does not want to legitimately deal with because of the overbearing burdens that all link back to her bastard child.
    *although we may be two centuries ahead, i do believe that somethings do not change.*

    ReplyDelete
  12. As much as I want to agree with Sifat, I have to go with Dicken's solution of sending them abroad. Society should be able to accept those who reform, but as Dicken's shows us in his novel this is not the case.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I agree with Karla. It was the only way for these women to start fresh, by emigrating. They will always remain a disgrace in the English society, no matter what they do. Lady Dedlock is a fictional character hence Dickens was able to give a new life without leaving the English society. Im sure in reality, the "fallen" woman could not have Lady dedlock had.

    ReplyDelete
  14. The whole Urania Cottage idea is just as Eddie said, just like the witness protection program. I agree that this is a good way to rehabilitate these fallen women and to help them get back on their feet but there are some women who went through the program but failed to complete the program and went back to their usual ways. It is hard for these women to assimilate into a new environment in such a short period of time which is why some of them resulted in failures. But why doesn't Dickens's have any prostitutes in Bleak House to portray his views in his own witty dickensian manner?

    ReplyDelete